A great first map [A-6]SgtGhost, 8/10.
PaN61
not too much else to it. plays fine, but not great. certainly not bad.
Nice work Sgt:)
ill be doing rail maps only,
i do have anohter rail gun map wich is abit bigger.
here's the link
sgtghost.homepage.com/q3railmap.htm
its call Railers Lost Box!
and Yes its another box with Railguns :)
later!!
Sarge
Oh yeah, back to the map.. Ghost, keep up the good work.. maybe next time add a few more donuts and bounce pads.. That's about the only thing that kinda made the map get boring really quickly..
If there was either another level up (damn mirror) or maybe make 3 donuts in a triangle fashion with corresponding jump pads and a 4th one in the middle higher (pyramid style) with a pad to get there too, it would really add some replayability to an otherwise cool map.
It's a good map to improve ur railing skills. The only thing that matter when i play in a map is having fun. I saw some very cool looking map with great architecture but they were lacking gameplay. here thats not the case
i don't see Tigger's comments as a review so much as an opening remark* i certainly don't only read what Tigger says about a map or give it any more weight than what others are saying - if Tigger wanted to set himself up as some sort of level guru this site would be the same as all the others - with only one opinion on it the map maker or a reviewer - which totally sucks dogsballs. You better hope no-one submits you to cranky steve's site now that man is harsh.
SgtGhost: I don't want to discourage you from mapping, I'd prefer to see everyone (myself included) stick at it and imporve, regardless of what the 'critics' say - and don't forget that a review is just a glorified opionion.
The point I wanted to make though is not specific to this map, but a general one. Tigger-oN is a mapper, and a lot of the people that comment here are mappers. Some of you guys need to be aware that map makers are a LOT more critical of levels than the average player. Whether that is good or bad is not particularly relevant, but that is the way it is, and as a result we will tend to be much more critical of crap, but also we tend to really praise the high quality levels (which are few and far between at the moment).
I'm sure there are plenty of people who are happy to play a box with railguns, however personally I want to see maps that are of a professional quality, with interesting visuals, good layouts and obviously nice gameplay (and light, item placement, ambient sounds.. etc...).
Maps with decent gameplay but poor visuals are not acceptable, and vice versa (just my opinion of course). Sorry. Why waste my time playing a level that plays ok but looks crap, when I can play levels that play well AND look great?
Railing is very satisfying a good map to help improve your rail skillz
i mena if u make a box.. thats has some curves and textures and leaks and other cool stuff :).. then you arent going to get a kickass review.. as good as you get would be a 'its cool for a box' id guess..
..hopefully ill have a map up here by the end of next week for the ultimate judgement :]
Later
[sno]
I did this map for my own pleasure to play against the bots, witch i don’t think they are that bad. I have submitted this map for one reason, to see what kind of review Tig would do, to be honest, i wasn’t surprised by is comments. I’ve sent this map to a lot of people and didn’t get any bad feedback so far, except for here.
Everyone has a right to give there opinion, but when you specify to send the readme file and you don’t even check out what’s in there, well maybe your should reconsider this website. If you didn’t understand what i meant Tig, that’s another reason for you to stop reviewing.
This is my first map in the Quake Community, its not a masterpiece, but I didn’t fail in gameplay and that’s were you failed Tig!!
Later!!
Sarge
Loading...
Search for a map.
Results will appear here.