.::LvL
Q3A Database
How to counter fake votes
Started by Tig
avatar
Tig Rep. 1104
#1   22 May 2021
Looks like people are creating fake accounts in order to spam vote for certain authors or maps.

In order to combat this, I'm thinking about changing the voting system to require a reputation of 30 to 50 before you can vote and / or limiting the number of votes per day to 2 unless you have over 500 reputation.

Hopefully, if these are not spam votes, the people making these votes (or wanting to vote) will leave comments on the maps first (to build up their rep), then come back and vote.

Before I make a change like this, I wanted to get some feedback, to judge if this kind of change is supported.

avatar
KommissarReb (SW12) Rep. 1980
#2   23 May 2021
Are they voting .5/5 or 5/5 on every map? If so then is the site set up to remove the effects of their votes if they get banned? I'm not sure about a reputation limit as spam voters were able to rack up a high reputation just by voting. Maybe if the reputation increase could come only if the vote isn't lowest or highest, or make it so voting doesn't affect reputation. I don't know if there's a solution beyond noticing individual voters who are abusing their voting privilege and individually restricting their ability to do that.
avatar
Tig Rep. 1104
#3   23 May 2021
The votes are 5/5 for one map author and 0.5/5 for another. Honestly, it really could just a coincident, but it is very unusual and consistent behaviour.

The idea behind limiting voting people with over (say) 30 reputation means the new members will need to have a few comments upvoted before they can vote. This should encourage some dialogue before being able to simply high and low vote a map.

avatar
KommissarReb (SW12) Rep. 1980
#4   23 May 2021
Then the bar should be either having comments upvoted, or better yet, be the author of approved reviews. For example, H217 (formerly known as HDK) has a reputation of 162 that mainly came from voting on maps years ago. I suppose one route would be to restrict privileges or ban people who were spammers a long time ago whilst still implementing your proposed changes.

Maybe making approved reviews should be a requirement so someone can't just easily farm rep so a spammer can't just make multiple sockpuppet accounts and upvote their own comments to spam? Or would that be a bad idea?

avatar
raspatan Rep. 3847
#5   29 days ago
I think it make sense. Such restrictions are used in other sites like Stackexchange. Just make sure to limit voting per day so you cannot build 30 rep through voting in a few days. So having voting limits based on reputation makes sense too.

Only registered members can post a reply.
Already registered? Sign in.

Clear