Q3Pacman
Q3Pacman by CuBeBoY
Comments
Add a comment
avatar
**Preview only**
Be sure to submit your comment
Formatting help
Submit
Preview
Cancel
Submitting comment...
avatar
Kyall Rep. 477
#9   11 Mar 2012
A very fun map. Nice idea of making a Pacman map, CuBeBoY. The textures were simple, but that didn't effect the gameplay. The black skybox was appropriate to the setting and the lighting, being that the lighting was dark made the map a lot more fun to play in. A dark maze with bonuses, weapons and about 8 bots or human players seemed quite fun to me. 9/10.
Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
avatar
FragTastic Rep. 2459
#8   05 Jan 2012
Very Intresting And Clever =).
Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
avatar
CZghost Rep. 1799
#7   30 Jul 2011
I've seen the "packman Q3 level" as DeFrag map (marked as run, but it's level map - you have to collect armor shards and you have to protect yourself from touching deadly ghosts. Then you have to go to saferoom, already protect yoursef from touching ghosts.)

But I've never seen Q3 packman level as baseq3 map...

Agree (1) or Disagree (0)
avatar
KommissarReb (SW12) Rep. 2498
#6   18 Jun 2011
I think there is another "Pacman" level out there for Quake 3. I think it was for UT though.
Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
avatar
Tig Rep. 2352
#5   19 Feb 2011
@Syncreedo: Try the F.A.Q. section, at the top right to the site, under 'Site' -> 'F.A.Q.' - You will find a section on how to play a map.

Also, you only need to post the message once.

Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
avatar
Syncreedo Rep. 0
#4   19 Feb 2011
couldnt get this to load.. any help wold be appreicated
Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
not entered unregistered
#3   10 Jul 2003
COOOOOOOOL!
Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
Monkeyboy[DRW] unregistered
#2   18 Dec 2001
LOOOL.......

Man.......now these are the kind of maps that makes Q3A more enjoyble.......

Graphics are ok.....even for me the graphics are eeeverything...........

Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
jal unregistered
#1   17 Dec 2001
LoL!

It's nice, although It should have shards all around :)

Agree (0) or Disagree (0)
Clear