DM/Tourney 2-5 player
FileFront, MHGaming, ..::LvL (1.16MiB, 3,191 d/loads)
Readme Maps by Author Authors site
FileFront, MHGaming, ..::LvL (1.16MiB, 3,191 d/loads)
Readme Maps by Author Authors site
Rate release: Currently 9.04 / 10 (13 votes)
180
9.04
d5c1e3f71a27f1c8c6415a4cb11dea0d
Mouse over to vote |
Your vote:
0 / 10 |
1631
Posted comments:
#10 julek
Not registered
17 Mar 2008, 9:30 am
one of my favouriteNot registered
17 Mar 2008, 9:30 am
#9 nakedape
Not registered
25 Dec 2004, 11:13 am
This map rocks! (if you like smallish levels)Not registered
25 Dec 2004, 11:13 am
It's got open spaces for railing, tight spaces for rockets, trick jumps for days, and lots of ways to cut guys off in the chase. woot! great fun for lunch time dueling!
#8 Tetzlaff
Not registered
20 Feb 2004, 1:58 am
I wouldn´t say that, this map is not as polished as the other id maps. Take a look at q3dm8 or q3dm0, they are visually great even by todays standards. Almost Lost has even the "broken jumppad shader" newbie error.Not registered
20 Feb 2004, 1:58 am
#7 RasputiN
Not registered
09 Nov 2003, 2:40 pm
Tetzlaff: polish-wise, the map design is pretty much on par with former id maps IMO. I guess we've been spoiled by all those great maps released since the early days of Q3. Not a bad map mind you, but seems a bit, well, mediocre. Maybe because it was meant to be played with VQ3, but I couldn't find the richness of gameplay I was hoping for.Not registered
09 Nov 2003, 2:40 pm
#6 pah
Not registered
09 Nov 2003, 6:42 am
I gamespy reacons the file doesnt exist. anyone else having trouble? is there a mirror?Not registered
09 Nov 2003, 6:42 am
#5 Pred
Not registered
08 Nov 2003, 1:18 pm
It has bot support or something??Not registered
08 Nov 2003, 1:18 pm
#4 Tetzlaff
Not registered
04 Nov 2003, 5:02 am
Yeah, the first thing I noticed was the lack of polish. Fred Nilson probably hasn´t much experience with level design, after all he´s just doing the animations for Doom3. Would have been better if one of id´s level designers finished the map.Not registered
04 Nov 2003, 5:02 am
#3 Scampie
Not registered
02 Nov 2003, 9:32 pm
Pure gameplay and little else... You can see why it was a q3 reject. It lacks so much polish, you almost wonder if it's really a professional map and not someone's first release.The main area that's pictured looks excellant, but everything else looks quickly thrown together in an attempt the finish it. Not to say it's horrible by any stretch of the word, but you wonder if it was worth saving in this day and age of maps with just as much fun, with better looks, and a lot more work put into them.Not registered
02 Nov 2003, 9:32 pm
#2 StormShadow
Not registered
01 Nov 2003, 6:39 pm
I dont know if i like it. The layout is decent, but the aesthetics are below average. I had some fun playing this one as an FFA on a pub server, but i dont think its quite id quality. Maybe if i played it as tourney more..The whacky respawn times aggravate me as well. 7/10 cuz im in a good mood :)Not registered
01 Nov 2003, 6:39 pm
#1 Tig
Not registered
01 Nov 2003, 5:42 pm
Something about this map makes me keep coming back to it. Its appears very simply at first, yet the layout works so well. It has something for all types of players (so long as you like smallish levels)Its a damn fine map :]Not registered
01 Nov 2003, 5:42 pm









